Head-to-Head Analysis

Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G vs Baby Spinach

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G

Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Baby Spinach

Baby Spinach

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285 kcal
Energy
23.5 kcal
1.9g
Sugars
0g
10g
Fat
0g
5.9g
Protein
2.4g
0.8g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G and Baby Spinach side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G is the more energy-dense option here, packing 261 more calories per 100g than Baby Spinach. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G contains significantly more sugar (1.85g) compared to the milder Baby Spinach (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Baby Spinach is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G offers a protein boost with 5.93g per 100g, outperforming Baby Spinach in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G or Baby Spinach?

It depends on your goals. Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G has 285 calories, while Baby Spinach has 23.529411764706 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G vegan?

No, Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Warburtons Multiseed Loaf Gluten Free 300G and Baby Spinach?

There is a difference of 261 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.