Head-to-Head Analysis

Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips vs Trident perfect peppermint slim pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips

Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Trident perfect peppermint slim pack

Trident perfect peppermint slim pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
35.7g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips and Trident perfect peppermint slim pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 531 more calories per 100g than Trident perfect peppermint slim pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Trident perfect peppermint slim pack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Trident perfect peppermint slim pack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Trident perfect peppermint slim pack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips or Trident perfect peppermint slim pack?

It depends on your goals. Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips has 536 calories, while Trident perfect peppermint slim pack has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips vegan?

No, Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wavy Loaded Nacho Chips and Trident perfect peppermint slim pack?

There is a difference of 531 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.