Head-to-Head Analysis

Wensleydale With cranberries vs Organic Classic Saltine Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wensleydale With cranberries

Wensleydale With cranberries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Classic Saltine Crackers

Organic Classic Saltine Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
10g
Sugars
0g
26.7g
Fat
10g
16.7g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wensleydale With cranberries and Organic Classic Saltine Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wensleydale With cranberries is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wensleydale With cranberries contains significantly more sugar (10g) compared to the milder Organic Classic Saltine Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Classic Saltine Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wensleydale With cranberries offers a protein boost with 16.7g per 100g, outperforming Organic Classic Saltine Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wensleydale With cranberries or Organic Classic Saltine Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Wensleydale With cranberries has 367 calories, while Organic Classic Saltine Crackers has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wensleydale With cranberries vegan?

No, Wensleydale With cranberries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wensleydale With cranberries and Organic Classic Saltine Crackers?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.