Wheat sub rolls vs Sliced California Ripe Olives
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wheat sub rolls
Sliced California Ripe Olives
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wheat sub rolls and Sliced California Ripe Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wheat sub rolls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 340 more calories per 100g than Sliced California Ripe Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Wheat sub rolls contains significantly more sugar (6.5789473684211g) compared to the milder Sliced California Ripe Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced California Ripe Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Wheat sub rolls offers a protein boost with 15.789473684211g per 100g, outperforming Sliced California Ripe Olives in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wheat sub rolls or Sliced California Ripe Olives?
It depends on your goals. Wheat sub rolls has 355.26315789474 calories, while Sliced California Ripe Olives has 15 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wheat sub rolls vegan?
No, Wheat sub rolls is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wheat sub rolls and Sliced California Ripe Olives?
There is a difference of 340 calories per 100g between the two products.
