Head-to-Head Analysis

Wheat Thins original vs Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wheat Thins original

Wheat Thins original

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars

Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
452 kcal
Energy
130 kcal
16.1g
Sugars
6g
16.1g
Fat
5g
6.5g
Protein
1g
1.6g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wheat Thins original and Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wheat Thins original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 322 more calories per 100g than Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wheat Thins original contains significantly more sugar (16.1g) compared to the milder Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wheat Thins original offers a protein boost with 6.45g per 100g, outperforming Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wheat Thins original or Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars?

It depends on your goals. Wheat Thins original has 452 calories, while Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars has 130 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wheat Thins original vegan?

No, Wheat Thins original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wheat Thins original and Cinnamon-Apple Multigrain Cereal Bars?

There is a difference of 322 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.