Head-to-Head Analysis

Wheat Thins reduced fat vs Milk Chocolate Kisses

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wheat Thins reduced fat

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk Chocolate Kisses

Milk Chocolate Kisses

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
414 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
13.8g
Sugars
56.3g
12.1g
Fat
28.1g
6.9g
Protein
6.3g
1.7g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wheat Thins reduced fat and Milk Chocolate Kisses side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wheat Thins reduced fat is the clear winner. With 86 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wheat Thins reduced fat takes the lead with only 13.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk Chocolate Kisses contains 56.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wheat Thins reduced fat or Milk Chocolate Kisses?

Wheat Thins reduced fat appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wheat Thins reduced fat vegan?

No, Wheat Thins reduced fat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wheat Thins reduced fat and Milk Chocolate Kisses?

There is a difference of 86 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.