Head-to-Head Analysis

Wheat Thins Reduced Fat vs Crispy Rounds Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wheat Thins Reduced Fat

Wheat Thins Reduced Fat

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crispy Rounds Original

Crispy Rounds Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
414 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
13.8g
Sugars
0g
12.1g
Fat
25g
6.9g
Protein
7.1g
1.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wheat Thins Reduced Fat and Crispy Rounds Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wheat Thins Reduced Fat is the clear winner. With 122 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wheat Thins Reduced Fat contains significantly more sugar (13.8g) compared to the milder Crispy Rounds Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crispy Rounds Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wheat Thins Reduced Fat or Crispy Rounds Original?

It depends on your goals. Wheat Thins Reduced Fat has 414 calories, while Crispy Rounds Original has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wheat Thins Reduced Fat vegan?

No, Wheat Thins Reduced Fat is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wheat Thins Reduced Fat and Crispy Rounds Original?

There is a difference of 122 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.