Head-to-Head Analysis

Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate vs The Original Chocolate Wafer

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate

Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of The Original Chocolate Wafer

The Original Chocolate Wafer

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
387 kcal
Energy
230 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
53g
4.8g
Fat
0g
77.4g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate and The Original Chocolate Wafer side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 157 more calories per 100g than The Original Chocolate Wafer. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate takes the lead with only 3.23g of sugar per 100g, whereas The Original Chocolate Wafer contains 53g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate offers a protein boost with 77.4g per 100g, outperforming The Original Chocolate Wafer in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate or The Original Chocolate Wafer?

It depends on your goals. Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate has 387 calories, while The Original Chocolate Wafer has 230 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate vegan?

No, Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whey Protein, Double Rich Chocolate and The Original Chocolate Wafer?

There is a difference of 157 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.