Head-to-Head Analysis

White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam vs Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam

White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut

Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
225 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
35g
Sugars
22.9g
10g
Fat
12.9g
0g
Protein
5.7g
0.3g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam and Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam is the clear winner. With 204 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam contains significantly more sugar (35g) compared to the milder Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut (22.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam or Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut?

It depends on your goals. White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam has 225 calories, while Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam vegan?

No, White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White Chocolate Barista Cold Foam and Nature Valley Fruit & Nut Dark Chocolate & Nut?

There is a difference of 204 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.