Head-to-Head Analysis

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vs 49 Flavors Jelly Beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 49 Flavors Jelly Beans

49 Flavors Jelly Beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433.3 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
28.3g
Sugars
70g
11.7g
Fat
0g
15g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and 49 Flavors Jelly Beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 83 more calories per 100g than 49 Flavors Jelly Beans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar takes the lead with only 28.3333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas 49 Flavors Jelly Beans contains 70g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar offers a protein boost with 15g per 100g, outperforming 49 Flavors Jelly Beans in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar or 49 Flavors Jelly Beans?

It depends on your goals. White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar has 433.333333333333 calories, while 49 Flavors Jelly Beans has 350 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar vegan?

No, White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White Chocolate Macadamia Nut Energy Bar and 49 Flavors Jelly Beans?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.