Head-to-Head Analysis

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars vs Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz

Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382.4 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
30.9g
Sugars
48g
10.3g
Fat
12g
13.2g
Protein
4g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars and Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars is the clear winner. With 18 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars takes the lead with only 30.88g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz contains 48g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars offers a protein boost with 13.24g per 100g, outperforming Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars or Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz?

White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars vegan?

No, White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White chocolate macadamia nut energy bars and Lu pim's cookies orange 1x5.290 oz?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.