Head-to-Head Analysis

White Mystery Candy vs Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of White Mystery Candy

White Mystery Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
385 kcal
Energy
345 kcal
70.5g
Sugars
37.9g
0g
Fat
5.2g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing White Mystery Candy and Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

White Mystery Candy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 40 more calories per 100g than Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. White Mystery Candy contains significantly more sugar (70.5g) compared to the milder Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz (37.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: White Mystery Candy or Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz?

It depends on your goals. White Mystery Candy has 385 calories, while Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz has 345 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is White Mystery Candy vegan?

No, White Mystery Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between White Mystery Candy and Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.