Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole cashews, lightly salted vs Garrett's original peg bag

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Whole cashews, lightly salted

Whole cashews, lightly salted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Garrett's original peg bag

Garrett's original peg bag

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
469 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
3.1g
46.4g
Fat
18.8g
17.9g
Protein
9.4g
0.4g
Salt
2.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole cashews, lightly salted and Garrett's original peg bag side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whole cashews, lightly salted is the more energy-dense option here, packing 138 more calories per 100g than Garrett's original peg bag. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Whole cashews, lightly salted contains significantly more sugar (7.14g) compared to the milder Garrett's original peg bag (3.12g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Garrett's original peg bag is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Whole cashews, lightly salted offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Garrett's original peg bag in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole cashews, lightly salted or Garrett's original peg bag?

It depends on your goals. Whole cashews, lightly salted has 607 calories, while Garrett's original peg bag has 469 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole cashews, lightly salted vegan?

No, Whole cashews, lightly salted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole cashews, lightly salted and Garrett's original peg bag?

There is a difference of 138 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.