Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole milk (3.25%) vs Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Whole milk (3.25%)

Whole milk (3.25%)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
62.5 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
5g
Sugars
3.3g
3.3g
Fat
15g
3.3g
Protein
6.7g
0.1g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole milk (3.25%) and Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Whole milk (3.25%) is the clear winner. With 371 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Whole milk (3.25%) contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps (3.3333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole milk (3.25%) or Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps?

It depends on your goals. Whole milk (3.25%) has 62.5 calories, while Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps has 433.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole milk (3.25%) vegan?

No, Whole milk (3.25%) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole milk (3.25%) and Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps?

There is a difference of 371 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.