Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese vs Pudding Butter Scotch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese

Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pudding Butter Scotch

Pudding Butter Scotch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
97.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
14.1g
23.3g
Fat
2.7g
20g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese and Pudding Butter Scotch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese is the more energy-dense option here, packing 202 more calories per 100g than Pudding Butter Scotch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pudding Butter Scotch contains 14.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Pudding Butter Scotch in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese or Pudding Butter Scotch?

It depends on your goals. Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese has 300 calories, while Pudding Butter Scotch has 97.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese vegan?

No, Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole Milk Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese and Pudding Butter Scotch?

There is a difference of 202 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.