Head-to-Head Analysis

Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry vs Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry

Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk

Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97.3 kcal
Energy
60.4 kcal
9.7g
Sugars
5.1g
3.5g
Fat
1.9g
3.5g
Protein
5.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry and Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 37 more calories per 100g than Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry contains significantly more sugar (9.73451327433628g) compared to the milder Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk (5.07g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry or Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk?

It depends on your goals. Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry has 97.3451327433628 calories, while Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk has 60.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry vegan?

No, Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Whole Milk Yogurt Blueberry and Chocolate Reduced Fat Ultra-filtered Milk?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.