Whole Natural Almonds vs Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Whole Natural Almonds
Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Whole Natural Almonds and Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Whole Natural Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 414 more calories per 100g than Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Whole Natural Almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls (1.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Whole Natural Almonds offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Whole Natural Almonds or Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls?
It depends on your goals. Whole Natural Almonds has 571 calories, while Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls has 157 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Whole Natural Almonds vegan?
No, Whole Natural Almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Whole Natural Almonds and Chile Relleno Casserole Bowls?
There is a difference of 414 calories per 100g between the two products.
