Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS vs Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS

Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS is the more energy-dense option here, packing 629 more calories per 100g than Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS contains significantly more sugar (6.5g) compared to the milder Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS offers a protein boost with 29g per 100g, outperforming Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS or Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?
It depends on your goals. Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS has 629 calories, while Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS vegan?
No, Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wicked Huge Extreme Mass Gainer CHOCLATE PB PUFFS and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?
There is a difference of 629 calories per 100g between the two products.




