Wild Alaska Pink Salmon vs Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Alaska Pink Salmon
Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Alaska Pink Salmon and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaska Pink Salmon is the clear winner. With 21 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Alaska Pink Salmon or Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?
It depends on your goals. Wild Alaska Pink Salmon has 94.1 calories, while Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild Alaska Pink Salmon vegan?
No, Wild Alaska Pink Salmon is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaska Pink Salmon and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?
There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.
