Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon vs Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon

Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil

Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
140 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
5.3g
Fat
23.8g
22.8g
Protein
20g
3.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon and Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon is the clear winner. With 160 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon offers a protein boost with 22.8g per 100g, outperforming Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon or Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil?

It depends on your goals. Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon has 140 calories, while Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaska Sockeye Smoked Salmon and Royal Fillets Mackerel in Olive Oil?

There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.