Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon vs Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141.2 kcal
Energy
94.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
5.9g
Fat
0.6g
23.5g
Protein
22.4g
0.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon or Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 141.176470588235 calories, while Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.