Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vs Sardines
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
Sardines
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and Sardines side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is the clear winner. With 49 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sardines contains 1.7857142857143g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets or Sardines?
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vegan?
No, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and Sardines?
There is a difference of 49 calories per 100g between the two products.
