Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vs StarKist Chunky Light Tuna
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets
StarKist Chunky Light Tuna
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and StarKist Chunky Light Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 44 more calories per 100g than StarKist Chunky Light Tuna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets offers a protein boost with 16.4g per 100g, outperforming StarKist Chunky Light Tuna in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets or StarKist Chunky Light Tuna?
It depends on your goals. Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets has 94 calories, while StarKist Chunky Light Tuna has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets vegan?
No, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets and StarKist Chunky Light Tuna?
There is a difference of 44 calories per 100g between the two products.
