Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets vs Fudge striped cookies
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets
Fudge striped cookies
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets and Fudge striped cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets is the clear winner. With 314 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fudge striped cookies contains 30.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Fudge striped cookies in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets or Fudge striped cookies?
Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets vegan?
No, Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets and Fudge striped cookies?
There is a difference of 314 calories per 100g between the two products.
