Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets vs Savory Rice Thins

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets

Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Savory Rice Thins

Savory Rice Thins

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
6.2g
Fat
8.3g
20.3g
Protein
10g
0.2g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets and Savory Rice Thins side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets is the clear winner. With 292 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets offers a protein boost with 20.3g per 100g, outperforming Savory Rice Thins in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets or Savory Rice Thins?

It depends on your goals. Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets has 141 calories, while Savory Rice Thins has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets vegan?

No, Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets and Savory Rice Thins?

There is a difference of 292 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.