Wild albacore solid white tuna vs Herring Fillets
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild albacore solid white tuna
Herring Fillets
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild albacore solid white tuna and Herring Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild albacore solid white tuna is the clear winner. With 43 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Looking to build muscle? Wild albacore solid white tuna offers a protein boost with 28.318584070796g per 100g, outperforming Herring Fillets in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild albacore solid white tuna or Herring Fillets?
It depends on your goals. Wild albacore solid white tuna has 132.74336283186 calories, while Herring Fillets has 176 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild albacore solid white tuna vegan?
No, Wild albacore solid white tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild albacore solid white tuna and Herring Fillets?
There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.
