Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Albacore Tuna vs Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Albacore Tuna

Wild Albacore Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wheat Thins reduced fat

Wheat Thins reduced fat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
414 kcal
0g
Sugars
13.8g
1.8g
Fat
12.1g
25.9g
Protein
6.9g
0.3g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Albacore Tuna and Wheat Thins reduced fat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Albacore Tuna is the clear winner. With 296 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Albacore Tuna takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wheat Thins reduced fat contains 13.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Albacore Tuna offers a protein boost with 25.9g per 100g, outperforming Wheat Thins reduced fat in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Albacore Tuna or Wheat Thins reduced fat?

Wild Albacore Tuna appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild Albacore Tuna vegan?

No, Wild Albacore Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Albacore Tuna and Wheat Thins reduced fat?

There is a difference of 296 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.