Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie vs Harmeless coconut water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie

Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Harmeless coconut water

Harmeless coconut water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
79 kcal
Energy
27.7 kcal
13g
Sugars
6.1g
1.1g
Fat
0g
3.4g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie and Harmeless coconut water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie is the more energy-dense option here, packing 51 more calories per 100g than Harmeless coconut water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie contains significantly more sugar (12.99g) compared to the milder Harmeless coconut water (6.05g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Harmeless coconut water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie offers a protein boost with 3.39g per 100g, outperforming Harmeless coconut water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie or Harmeless coconut water?

It depends on your goals. Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie has 79 calories, while Harmeless coconut water has 27.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie vegan?

No, Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Smoothie and Harmeless coconut water?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.