Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder vs Sour Brite gummi bears

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder

Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sour Brite gummi bears

Sour Brite gummi bears

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
322.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
48.4g
5.1g
Fat
0g
68.1g
Protein
3.2g
1.9g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder and Sour Brite gummi bears side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder is the more energy-dense option here, packing 52 more calories per 100g than Sour Brite gummi bears. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour Brite gummi bears contains 48.387096774194g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder offers a protein boost with 68.1g per 100g, outperforming Sour Brite gummi bears in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder or Sour Brite gummi bears?

It depends on your goals. Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder has 375 calories, while Sour Brite gummi bears has 322.58064516129 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder vegan?

No, Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Blueberry Flavoree Protein Powder and Sour Brite gummi bears?

There is a difference of 52 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.