Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon vs Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon

Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133 kcal
Energy
419.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
61.3g
4.4g
Fat
9.7g
22.1g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon and Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews contains 61.2903g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon offers a protein boost with 22.1g per 100g, outperforming Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon or Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews?

Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Alaskan Sockeye Salmon and Hi chew superfruit mix flavored fruit chews?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.