Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild-Caught Cod Fillets vs Chilean Atlantic Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild-Caught Cod Fillets

Wild-Caught Cod Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chilean Atlantic Salmon

Chilean Atlantic Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
79.6 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
18.5g
17.7g
Protein
21.2g
0.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild-Caught Cod Fillets and Chilean Atlantic Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild-Caught Cod Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 80 more calories per 100g than Chilean Atlantic Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild-Caught Cod Fillets or Chilean Atlantic Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild-Caught Cod Fillets has 79.646017699115 calories, while Chilean Atlantic Salmon has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild-Caught Cod Fillets vegan?

No, Wild-Caught Cod Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild-Caught Cod Fillets and Chilean Atlantic Salmon?

There is a difference of 80 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.