Wild-Caught Cod Fillets vs Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild-Caught Cod Fillets
Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild-Caught Cod Fillets and Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild-Caught Cod Fillets is the clear winner. With 277 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild-Caught Cod Fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites contains 21.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild-Caught Cod Fillets or Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites?
Wild-Caught Cod Fillets appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild-Caught Cod Fillets vegan?
No, Wild-Caught Cod Fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild-Caught Cod Fillets and Maple-Glazed & Smoked Salmon Bites?
There is a difference of 277 calories per 100g between the two products.
