Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna vs Fish steaks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna

Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Fish steaks

Fish steaks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
194.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
9.7g
Fat
0g
26.5g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna and Fish steaks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 195 more calories per 100g than Fish steaks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna offers a protein boost with 26.548672566372g per 100g, outperforming Fish steaks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna or Fish steaks?

It depends on your goals. Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna has 194.69026548673 calories, while Fish steaks has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna vegan?

No, Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild-Caught Gourmet Tuna and Fish steaks?

There is a difference of 195 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.