Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught key west pink shrimp vs Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild caught key west pink shrimp

Wild caught key west pink shrimp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce

Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
88.5 kcal
Energy
655 kcal
0g
Sugars
20g
0.4g
Fat
55g
20.4g
Protein
15g
0.3g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught key west pink shrimp and Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught key west pink shrimp is the clear winner. With 567 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Wild caught key west pink shrimp takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce contains 20g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught key west pink shrimp offers a protein boost with 20.353982300885g per 100g, outperforming Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught key west pink shrimp or Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce?

Wild caught key west pink shrimp appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Wild caught key west pink shrimp vegan?

No, Wild caught key west pink shrimp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught key west pink shrimp and Roasted Seaweed Flakes with Butter & Soy Sauce?

There is a difference of 567 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.