Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water vs Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon

Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
94.1 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.6g
Fat
4.4g
22.4g
Protein
22.1g
1g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water and Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water is the clear winner. With 39 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water or Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water has 94.1 calories, while Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water vegan?

No, Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water and Wild caught alaska sockeye salmon?

There is a difference of 39 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.