Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Caught Salmon Portions vs Wild caught, tuna steaks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Caught Salmon Portions

Wild Caught Salmon Portions

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild caught, tuna steaks

Wild caught, tuna steaks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
89.3 kcal
Energy
106 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0.4g
16.1g
Protein
24.8g
0.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Caught Salmon Portions and Wild caught, tuna steaks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Salmon Portions is the clear winner. With 17 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Caught Salmon Portions or Wild caught, tuna steaks?

It depends on your goals. Wild Caught Salmon Portions has 89.285714285714 calories, while Wild caught, tuna steaks has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Caught Salmon Portions vegan?

No, Wild Caught Salmon Portions is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Salmon Portions and Wild caught, tuna steaks?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.