Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets vs Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets

Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce

Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133 kcal
Energy
152 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
4.4g
Fat
8.8g
22.1g
Protein
20g
0.2g
Salt
960g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets and Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets is the clear winner. With 19 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets offers a protein boost with 22.12g per 100g, outperforming Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets or Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets has 133 calories, while Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce has 152 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets vegan?

No, Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught sockeye salmon fillets and Sumaco Sardines in Tomato Sauce?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.