Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught tuna vs Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild caught tuna

Wild caught tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
132.7 kcal
Energy
115 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
0.9g
28.3g
Protein
26.5g
0.8g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught tuna and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild caught tuna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught tuna or Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught tuna has 132.74336283186 calories, while Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught tuna vegan?

No, Wild caught tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught tuna and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.