Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil vs Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil
Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil and Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil is the clear winner. With 225 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil takes the lead with only 2.82g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade contains 5.63g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil offers a protein boost with 21.1g per 100g, outperforming Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil or Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade?
Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil vegan?
No, Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Caught Tuna Seasoned with Sun-Dried Tomato & Basil and Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade?
There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.
