Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught, tuna steaks vs Extra Large Shrimp

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild caught, tuna steaks

Wild caught, tuna steaks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Extra Large Shrimp

Extra Large Shrimp

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
70.5 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
0g
24.8g
Protein
17.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught, tuna steaks and Extra Large Shrimp side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild caught, tuna steaks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Extra Large Shrimp. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught, tuna steaks offers a protein boost with 24.78g per 100g, outperforming Extra Large Shrimp in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught, tuna steaks or Extra Large Shrimp?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught, tuna steaks has 106 calories, while Extra Large Shrimp has 70.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught, tuna steaks vegan?

No, Wild caught, tuna steaks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught, tuna steaks and Extra Large Shrimp?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.