Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild caught, tuna steaks vs Smoked Atlantic Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild caught, tuna steaks

Wild caught, tuna steaks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Smoked Atlantic Salmon

Smoked Atlantic Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
164.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.4g
Fat
8.2g
24.8g
Protein
22.4g
0.1g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild caught, tuna steaks and Smoked Atlantic Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught, tuna steaks is the clear winner. With 59 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Wild caught, tuna steaks offers a protein boost with 24.78g per 100g, outperforming Smoked Atlantic Salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild caught, tuna steaks or Smoked Atlantic Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Wild caught, tuna steaks has 106 calories, while Smoked Atlantic Salmon has 164.7059 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild caught, tuna steaks vegan?

No, Wild caught, tuna steaks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild caught, tuna steaks and Smoked Atlantic Salmon?

There is a difference of 59 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.