Wild caught, tuna steaks vs Wild alaska pink salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild caught, tuna steaks
Wild alaska pink salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild caught, tuna steaks and Wild alaska pink salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught, tuna steaks is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Looking to build muscle? Wild caught, tuna steaks offers a protein boost with 24.78g per 100g, outperforming Wild alaska pink salmon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild caught, tuna steaks or Wild alaska pink salmon?
It depends on your goals. Wild caught, tuna steaks has 106 calories, while Wild alaska pink salmon has 118 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild caught, tuna steaks vegan?
No, Wild caught, tuna steaks is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild caught, tuna steaks and Wild alaska pink salmon?
There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.
