Wild caught, tuna steaks vs Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild caught, tuna steaks
Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild caught, tuna steaks and Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild caught, tuna steaks is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Wild caught, tuna steaks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet contains 1.89g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Wild caught, tuna steaks offers a protein boost with 24.78g per 100g, outperforming Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild caught, tuna steaks or Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet?
Wild caught, tuna steaks appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Wild caught, tuna steaks vegan?
No, Wild caught, tuna steaks is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild caught, tuna steaks and Wild Caught Crunchy Fish Fillet?
There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.
