Wild herring fillets vs Brisling Sardines
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild herring fillets
Brisling Sardines
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild herring fillets and Brisling Sardines side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wild herring fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Brisling Sardines. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Wild herring fillets contains significantly more sugar (2g) compared to the milder Brisling Sardines (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Brisling Sardines is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Wild herring fillets offers a protein boost with 14g per 100g, outperforming Brisling Sardines in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild herring fillets or Brisling Sardines?
It depends on your goals. Wild herring fillets has 200 calories, while Brisling Sardines has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild herring fillets vegan?
No, Wild herring fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild herring fillets and Brisling Sardines?
There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.
