WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets vs kim chi
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets
kim chi
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets and kim chi side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 26 more calories per 100g than kim chi. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas kim chi contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets offers a protein boost with 17.6991150442478g per 100g, outperforming kim chi in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets or kim chi?
It depends on your goals. WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets has 79.646017699115 calories, while kim chi has 53.6 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets vegan?
No, WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between WILD PACIFIC COD boneless skinless fillets and kim chi?
There is a difference of 26 calories per 100g between the two products.
