Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Pacific Pink Salmon vs Tuna steak in spring water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Pacific Pink Salmon

Wild Pacific Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tuna steak in spring water

Tuna steak in spring water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
116 kcal
0g
Sugars
0.3g
2.4g
Fat
0.5g
21.2g
Protein
27g
0.3g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Pacific Pink Salmon and Tuna steak in spring water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Pacific Pink Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 2 more calories per 100g than Tuna steak in spring water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Pink Salmon or Tuna steak in spring water?

It depends on your goals. Wild Pacific Pink Salmon has 118 calories, while Tuna steak in spring water has 116 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Pacific Pink Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Pacific Pink Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Pacific Pink Salmon and Tuna steak in spring water?

There is a difference of 2 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.