Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Pacific Salmon vs CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild Pacific Salmon

Wild Pacific Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

CHUNK LIGHT TUNA

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
124 kcal
Energy
105.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
4g
Fat
0g
20.4g
Protein
21.2g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Pacific Salmon and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild Pacific Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than CHUNK LIGHT TUNA. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Salmon or CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

It depends on your goals. Wild Pacific Salmon has 124 calories, while CHUNK LIGHT TUNA has 105.882352941176 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Pacific Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Pacific Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Pacific Salmon and CHUNK LIGHT TUNA?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.