Wild Pacific Salmon vs Solid white albacore tuna in water
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Wild Pacific Salmon
Solid white albacore tuna in water
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Wild Pacific Salmon and Solid white albacore tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Wild Pacific Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than Solid white albacore tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Salmon or Solid white albacore tuna in water?
It depends on your goals. Wild Pacific Salmon has 124 calories, while Solid white albacore tuna in water has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Wild Pacific Salmon vegan?
No, Wild Pacific Salmon is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Wild Pacific Salmon and Solid white albacore tuna in water?
There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.
