Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon vs Sweet & Spicy Tuna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet & Spicy Tuna

Sweet & Spicy Tuna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
122 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
4.1g
Fat
0.7g
20g
Protein
21.6g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon and Sweet & Spicy Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon is the clear winner. With 4 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon or Sweet & Spicy Tuna?

It depends on your goals. Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon has 118 calories, while Sweet & Spicy Tuna has 122 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon vegan?

No, Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild Pacific Sockeye Salmon and Sweet & Spicy Tuna?

There is a difference of 4 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.