Head-to-Head Analysis

Wild pink Salmon vs Wild-Caught Cod Fillets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Wild pink Salmon

Wild pink Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild-Caught Cod Fillets

Wild-Caught Cod Fillets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
98.2 kcal
Energy
79.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
0.9g
17.9g
Protein
17.7g
0.3g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Wild pink Salmon and Wild-Caught Cod Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Wild pink Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 19 more calories per 100g than Wild-Caught Cod Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Wild pink Salmon or Wild-Caught Cod Fillets?

It depends on your goals. Wild pink Salmon has 98.2 calories, while Wild-Caught Cod Fillets has 79.646017699115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Wild pink Salmon vegan?

No, Wild pink Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Wild pink Salmon and Wild-Caught Cod Fillets?

There is a difference of 19 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.